🆚 Contao vs. Ibexa DXP
- 📈 Contao is much more popular than Ibexa DXP.
- 🌍 Contao is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
- 🌍 Ibexa DXP is more popular in Canada, Spain, and Portugal.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Headquarters
Lyss, Switzerland
Oslo, Norway
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️Open source
Ibexa Headless€30,000+/year
Ibexa Experience€38,000+/year
Ibexa Commerce€45,000+/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Contao CMS is 17 times more popular than Ibexa DXP.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Contao is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, while Ibexa DXP is more popular in Canada, Spain, and Portugal.
Germany
Austria
Switzerland
France
Poland
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Italy
Greece
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Austria in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Switzerland in the CMS category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in France in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 44th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Contao is more popular among sites focused on business, travel, and marketing and merchandising, while Ibexa DXP is more commonly used on finance and banking, and general news sites.
Business
Travel
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Internet Services
Health
Public Information
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.