🆚 Boku vs. dLocal
- 📈 dLocal is noticeably more popular than Boku.
- 🌎 dLocal is more popular in the United States, Spain, and Lithuania.
- 🌍 Boku is more popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Payment service
Payment service
About
Boku is a B2B payment network that aggregates local payment methods (up to 300 worldwide) and processes these payments on behalf of its customers (merchants). Its customers are large global merchants such as Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft.
dLocal is a payment platform that makes it possible to accept payment methods and currencies from the emerging markets.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Montevideo, Uruguay
Pricing
Card transaction fees
Argentina2.99%
Brazil1.99%
Mexico2.49% + $0.20
Panama2.99% + $0.30
Indonesia5.50%
Malaysia5.50%
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The dLocal payment service is 1.8 times more popular than Boku.
Total websites
Market share
Payments
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
dLocal is more popular in the United States, Spain, and Lithuania, while Boku is more popular in Germany.
United States
Germany
Spain
Ireland
Lithuania
Austria
Canada
France
Sweden
Brazil
Awards
- ⬆️ 48th most popular in the United States in the Payments category.
- ⬆️ 43rd most popular in the United States in the Payments category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
dLocal is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and travel, while Boku is more commonly used on games sites.
Games
Instant Messaging
Business
Job Search
Marketing/Merchandising
Interactive Web Applications
Web Phone
Online Shopping
Travel
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
