🆚 BotD vs. FastClick
- 📈 FastClick is much more popular than BotD.
- 🌍 FastClick is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ BotD is particularly popular in the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
BotD
FastClickType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
BotD is an open-source 
JavaScript library that detects bots and automation tools directly in the browser without requiring a server component. It identifies headless browsers, automation frameworks, spoofed clients, virtual machines, and common search bots.
FastClick is a library for eliminating the 300ms delay between a physical tap and the firing of a click event on mobile browsers.
Headquarters
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The FastClick JavaScript library is 116 times more popular than BotD.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
FastClick is more popular than BotD in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
China
Germany
Spain
Canada
Australia
Netherlands
Vietnam
Italy
Awards
- 🔥 15th most popular in Tanzania in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 51st most popular in China in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 64th most popular in Vietnam in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 79th most popular in Malaysia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 104th most popular in Taiwan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
FastClick is more popular than BotD in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Internet Services
General News
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Entertainment
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
UAParser.js🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.