🆚 BotD vs. css-vars-ponyfill
- 📈 css-vars-ponyfill is much more popular than BotD.
- 🌍 css-vars-ponyfill is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ BotD is particularly popular in the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
BotDType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
BotD is an open-source 
JavaScript library that detects bots and automation tools directly in the browser without requiring a server component. It identifies headless browsers, automation frameworks, spoofed clients, virtual machines, and common search bots.
Client-side support for 
CSS custom properties (aka "CSS variables") in legacy and modern browsers.
Headquarters
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The css-vars-ponyfill JavaScript library is 105 times more popular than BotD.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
css-vars-ponyfill is more popular than BotD in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Germany
Canada
Australia
Austria
India
Italy
France
Awards
- ⬆️ 68th most popular in Austria in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 72nd most popular in Finland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 93rd most popular in Denmark in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 94th most popular in Canada in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 94th most popular in New Zealand in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
css-vars-ponyfill is more popular than BotD in all market segments.
Online Shopping
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
General News
Fashion/Beauty
Travel
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Real Estate
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.