🆚 Buildbot vs. TeamCity
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 Buildbot is slightly more popular than TeamCity.
- 🌍 Buildbot is more popular in Germany and Finland.
- 🌎 TeamCity is more popular in the United States and France.
TeamCityType
Continuous integration and continuous delivery tool
Continuous integration and continuous delivery tool
About
Buildbot is a Python-based continuous integration system that automates the compile/test cycle required by most software projects to validate code changes.
TeamCity is a general-purpose CI/CD server developed by JetBrains.
Headquarters
New York, United States
Prague, Czech Republic
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️On-premises, up to 3 build agents
Build agent$359
Enterprise server license$2,399
In the Cloud$54+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Buildbot CI/CD tool is 1.4 times more popular than TeamCity.
Total websites
Market share
CI/CD
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Buildbot is more popular in Germany and Finland, while TeamCity is more popular in the United States and France.
Germany
United States
Finland
France
Lithuania
Ireland
Norway
Sweden
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Name
Rank
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
AWS CodeBuild
Travis CI
Atlassian Statuspage
Software Freedom Conservancy company profile* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.