🆚 TeamCity vs. Travis CI
- 📈 Travis CI is much more popular than TeamCity.
- 🌎 Travis CI is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France.
- 🌍 TeamCity is more popular in Sweden.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
CI/CD tool
CI/CD tool
About
TeamCity is a general-purpose CI/CD server developed by JetBrains.
Travis CI is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery service that automates building, testing, and deploying software projects.
It provides preconfigured environments for over 30 programming languages, uses a build matrix for parallel jobs and YAML-based configuration, isolates builds in virtual machines, automates deployments, and integrates with
GitHub,
Bitbucket,
GitLab, and
SVN.
Headquarters
Prague, Czech Republic
Berlin, Germany
Pricing
Free version ✔️ On-premises, up to 3 build agents
Build agent $359
Enterprise server license $2,399
In the Cloud $54+/month
Free tier ✔️ 10,000 credits, deducted per use, expire in one year
Usage-based $15+/month
Concurrency-based $69+/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Travis CI CI/CD tool is 8 times more popular than TeamCity.
Total websites
Market share
CI/CD
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Travis CI is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France, while TeamCity is more popular in Sweden.
United States
Germany
France
Sweden
Ireland
Netherlands
Switzerland
Japan
United Kingdom
China
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Travis CI is more popular than TeamCity in all market segments.
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Technical Information
Technical/Business Forums
Personal Pages
Business
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Motor Vehicles
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Name
Rank
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.