🆚 Builder.io vs. Hygraph
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 Builder.io is twice as popular as Hygraph.
- 🌎 Builder.io is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- 🌎 Hygraph is more popular in Germany, the Netherlands, and Brazil.
Builder.ioType
About
Builder.io is a visual development platform and headless CMS that lets teams create, edit, and publish websites and applications with drag-and-drop editors, integrated with React, Vue, Svelte, Qwik, and other frameworks.
It supports importing designs from Figma, registering custom components, exposing structured data models, and includes scheduling, versioning, content targeting, and enterprise features such as roles and permissions.
Hygraph, formerly known as GraphCMS, is a headless content management system based on GraphQL.
Headquarters
Pricing
(Visual IDE)
(500 Agent Credits)$30/user/month
(Visual CMS)
(500 Agent Credits)$49/user/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in Australia in the Website Builders category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in the United States in the Website Builders category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in Germany in the Website Builders category.
- ⬆️ 43rd most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 39th most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 50th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 56th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Sanity* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.