🆚 C# vs. Go

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *
C#
Go

Type

Programming language
Programming language

About

C# is a high-level, statically typed, object-oriented programming language developed for the .NET platform.

It features strong type safety, automatic memory management via garbage collection, async and parallel programming support, LINQ for data querying, rich standard libraries, and is widely used for building desktop, web, and enterprise applications.

Go, also known as Golang, is a high-level, statically typed, compiled programming language developed at Google. It features runtime efficiency, built-in concurrency, and high-performance networking.

Headquarters

Redmond, Washington, United States
Mountain View, California, United States

Website

Categories

Programming Languages › Rank #3
Programming Languages › Rank #12
Platforms › Rank #8

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The C# programming language is 33 times more popular than Go.
Total websites

Market share

Programming Languages

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

C# is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and China, while Go is more popular in Saint Helena and Palau.
United States
United Kingdom
China
Italy
Turkey
India
Netherlands
Germany
Canada
Australia

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

C# is more popular than Go in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Sports
Health
Travel
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Finance/Banking

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,368
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.