🆚 Canny vs. Redmine

Type

Customer feedback tool
Issue tracking system

About

Canny is a product management tool focused on user feedback that centralizes customer suggestions, feature requests, and roadmap planning in one platform.

It offers embeddable feedback boards and widgets with upvotes, comments, and duplicate detection, prioritization tools including custom scoring and user segmentation, public and private roadmaps, changelogs with status updates, AI-assisted feedback summaries and smart replies, and integrations with tools such as Jira, GitHub, Slack, Intercom, and CRM systems.

Redmine is an open-source project management and issue tracking web application built in Ruby on Rails.

Headquarters

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️25 tracked users
Core
(100+ tracked users)
$24+/month
Pro
(+PM integrations)
$99+/month
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Feedback › Rank #51
Issue Tracking › Rank #6
Issue Tracking › Rank #9
Widgets › Rank #69
Project Management › Rank #6

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Canny feedback tool is 1.6 times more popular than Redmine.
Total websites

Market share

Issue Tracking

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Canny is more popular in the United States, France, and the Netherlands, while Redmine is more popular in Germany, Italy, and Japan.
United States
Germany
Italy
France
Japan
Netherlands
United Kingdom
India
Spain
Russia

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Canny is more popular among sites focused on business, Internet services, and interactive web applications, while Redmine is more commonly used on job search, education and reference, and major global religions sites.
Business
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Marketing/Merchandising
Job Search
Education/Reference
Interactive Web Applications
Finance/Banking
Major Global Religions
General News

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#7,359
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#30,307
View more ➝

See also

🗃️ About This Data