🆚 CDNFonts vs. TypeSquare
- 📈 TypeSquare is as popular as CDNFonts.
- 🌍 TypeSquare is more popular in Japan and Afghanistan.
- 🌎 CDNFonts is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Font platform
Font platform
About
CDNFonts empowers designers, developers, and content creators by offering a comprehensive collection of over 26,000 fonts.
TypeSquare is a Japanese web font service.
Headquarters
San Mateo, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The TypeSquare font platform is as popular as CDNFonts.
Total websites
Market share
Fonts
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
TypeSquare is more popular in Japan and Afghanistan, while CDNFonts is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
Japan
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Brazil
India
Italy
Netherlands
Spain
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Korea in the Fonts category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in France in the Fonts category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Brazil in the Fonts category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in India in the Fonts category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Spain in the Fonts category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Japan in the Fonts category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
TypeSquare is more popular among sites focused on non-profit, advocacy and NGO, while CDNFonts is more commonly used on business, online shopping, and marketing and merchandising sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Education/Reference
Travel
Health
Entertainment
Finance/Banking
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,823,966 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.