🆚 Google Fonts vs. TypeSquare
- 📈 Google Fonts is much more popular than TypeSquare.
- 🌍 Google Fonts is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ TypeSquare is particularly popular in Japan.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Google FontsType
Font platform
Font platform
About
Google Fonts is a free library of fonts and icons hosted by Google for use in web pages, apps, and print.
It offers over 1,900 open-source font families with variable and traditional styles, multilingual support with language filters, simple 
CSS and developer APIs for integration, and an extensive set of Material Symbols icons.
TypeSquare is a Japanese web font service.
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
San Mateo, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Google Fonts platform is 435 times more popular than TypeSquare.
Total websites
Market share
Fonts
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Google Fonts is more popular than TypeSquare in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
France
Spain
Italy
Netherlands
Germany
Australia
India
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Fonts category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Fonts category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Fonts category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Fonts category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the Fonts category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Japan in the Fonts category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Google Fonts is more popular than TypeSquare in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Entertainment
Health
Sports
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Adobe Fonts
Bunny Fonts
Morisawa Biz+
Google company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,995 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.