🆚 Cendyn CMS vs. RMS Cloud
- 📈 RMS Cloud is twice as popular as Cendyn CMS.
- 🌍 RMS Cloud is more popular in Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 Cendyn CMS is more popular in the United States and Canada.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Cendyn CMS is a specialized content management system built for hoteliers.
RMS Cloud is an Australian cloud-based property management system for hospitality businesses.
Headquarters
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Pricing
Free version ❌
On request
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The RMS Cloud CMS is 2.1 times more popular than Cendyn CMS.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
RMS Cloud is more popular in Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, while Cendyn CMS is more popular in the United States and Canada.
United States
Australia
New Zealand
United Kingdom
Canada
United Arab Emirates
Egypt
Japan
South Africa
Sri Lanka
Awards
- ⬆️ 79th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Hotel Booking category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United States in the Hotel Booking category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 91st most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
RMS Cloud is more popular among sites focused on recreation and hobbies, and restaurants, while Cendyn CMS is more commonly used on travel and marketing and merchandising sites.
Travel
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Recreation/Hobbies
Restaurants
Entertainment
General News
Public Information
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Hapi