🆚 Chart.js vs. FusionCharts
- 📈 Chart.js is much more popular than FusionCharts.
- 🌍 Chart.js is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Charting library
Charting library
About
Chart.js is an open-source JavaScript library for data visualization that renders charts in
HTML5 canvas.
It supports bar, line, pie, bubble, radar, polar area, scatter, and mixed charts, and offers built-in responsiveness, customizable animations, tooltip and legend controls, and tree-shaking to reduce bundle size.
FusionCharts is a paid JavaScript charting library that provides over 100 chart types and 2,000 maps.
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ❌
Basic$439/year
Pro$1,899/year
Enterprise$3,399/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Chart.js charting library is 383 times more popular than FusionCharts.
Total websites
Market share
Charting
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Chart.js is more popular than FusionCharts in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Australia
Germany
Canada
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
France
Indonesia
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Charting category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Charting category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Charting category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Charting category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Charting category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in the United States in the Charting category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Chart.js is more popular than FusionCharts in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Health
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.