🆚 CKEditor vs. FitText
- 📈 CKEditor is twice as popular as FitText.
- 🌎 CKEditor is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France.
- 🌍 FitText is more popular in Japan, Jordan, and Liechtenstein.
CKEditorType
About
CKEditor is a 
JavaScript-based WYSIWYG rich text editor used in web applications to create and edit formatted content directly in the browser.
It provides rich text and media editing, real-time and asynchronous collaboration, 
HTML and 
Markdown output, import from Word, export to Word and PDF, over 100 available plugins, and native integrations with frameworks such as 
React, 
Angular, 
Vue, 
Next.js, and 
Laravel.
FitText is a 
jQuery flexible font plugin that allows elements to fill the width of their parent elements.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5K editor loads)$160/month
(20K editor loads)$450/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 30th most popular in Kazakhstan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in Ukraine in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 38th most popular in Nepal in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 44th most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 92nd most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 94th most popular in Sweden in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 98th most popular in Slovakia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 99th most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 99th most popular in Hungary in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
TinyMCE
Froala
Quill
Editor.js
HugeRTE
Mustache.js🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.