🆚 CKEditor vs. FitText
- 📈 CKEditor is three times more popular than FitText.
- 🌎 CKEditor is more popular in the United States, Spain, and France.
- 🌍 FitText is more popular in Japan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Malta.
Type
About
CKEditor is a JavaScript-based WYSIWYG rich text editor used in web applications to create and edit formatted content directly in the browser.
It provides rich text and media editing, real-time and asynchronous collaboration, HTML and
Markdown output, import from Word, export to Word and PDF, over 100 available plugins, and native integrations with frameworks such as
React,
Angular,
Vue,
Next.js, and
Laravel.
FitText is a jQuery flexible font plugin that allows elements to fill the width of their parent elements.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5K editor loads) $160/month
(20K editor loads) $450/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Kazakhstan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in Ukraine in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 33rd most popular in Nepal in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 38th most popular in Finland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 102nd most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 102nd most popular in Sweden in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 102nd most popular in Hungary in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 102nd most popular in Denmark in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 104th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.



