🆚 FitText vs. Froala
- 📈 FitText is twice as popular as Froala.
- 🌎 FitText is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Froala is more popular in Japan, Austria, and Korea.
FroalaType
About
FitText is a 
jQuery flexible font plugin that allows elements to fill the width of their parent elements.
Froala is a commercial 
JavaScript WYSIWYG 
HTML editor that enables rich text editing within web applications and content management systems.
It is designed as a high-performance editor with fast initialization, supports 35+ interface languages and 
WCAG accessibility compliance, offers 30+ plugins for images, tables, videos, and code view, integrates with 15+ frameworks including 
React, 
Angular, and 
Vue, and provides server SDKs for 
Node.js, 
PHP, Python, 
Java, and 
.NET.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 92nd most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 94th most popular in Sweden in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 98th most popular in Slovakia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 99th most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 99th most popular in Hungary in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 47th most popular in Nepal in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 65th most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 86th most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 111st most popular in Austria in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 121st most popular in China in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
CKEditor
TinyMCE
Mustache.js
Quill
MediumEditor
Editor.js🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.