🆚 Froala vs. Quill
- 📈 Froala is twice as popular as Quill.
- 🌎 Froala is more popular in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 Quill is more popular in Brazil, Russia, and Taiwan.
Froala
QuillType
About
Froala is a commercial 
JavaScript WYSIWYG 
HTML editor that enables rich text editing within web applications and content management systems.
It is designed as a high-performance editor with fast initialization, supports 35+ interface languages and 
WCAG accessibility compliance, offers 30+ plugins for images, tables, videos, and code view, integrates with 15+ frameworks including 
React, 
Angular, and 
Vue, and provides server SDKs for 
Node.js, 
PHP, Python, 
Java, and 
.NET.
Quill is an open-source JavaScript WYSIWYG text editor designed to provide consistent content editing across browsers using a structured document model.
It is built around a 
JSON-based delta format for representing content and changes, supports core text formatting and embeds, offers a modular API with themes and modules, and requires third-party plugins or converters to export content as HTML.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 47th most popular in Nepal in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 65th most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 86th most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 111st most popular in Austria in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 121st most popular in China in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 124th most popular in Taiwan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 140th most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 149th most popular in China in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 168th most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 175th most popular in Brazil in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
CKEditor
TinyMCE
MediumEditor
Editor.js🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.