🆚 Editor.js vs. Froala
- 📈 Froala is much more popular than Editor.js.
- 🌍 Froala is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Editor.js is particularly popular in Russia.
Editor.js
FroalaType
About
Editor.js is an open-source 
JavaScript text editor that uses block-based editing and stores content as structured 
JSON rather than 
HTML.
It focuses on modular content blocks for text, headings, images, lists, tables, quotes, and embeds, enables drag-and-drop block reordering, includes data sanitization, supports extensibility through custom tools and plugins, and is designed for integration with backend systems that require structured content storage.
Froala is a commercial JavaScript WYSIWYG HTML editor that enables rich text editing within web applications and content management systems.
It is designed as a high-performance editor with fast initialization, supports 35+ interface languages and 
WCAG accessibility compliance, offers 30+ plugins for images, tables, videos, and code view, integrates with 15+ frameworks including 
React, 
Angular, and 
Vue, and provides server SDKs for 
Node.js, 
PHP, Python, 
Java, and 
.NET.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 39th most popular in Nepal in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 65th most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 82nd most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 94th most popular in Austria in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 128th most popular in Belgium in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.