🆚 Editor.js vs. TinyMCE
- 📈 TinyMCE is much more popular than Editor.js.
- 🌍 TinyMCE is more popular in all countries.
Editor.js
TinyMCEType
About
Editor.js is an open-source 
JavaScript text editor that uses block-based editing and stores content as structured 
JSON rather than 
HTML.
It focuses on modular content blocks for text, headings, images, lists, tables, quotes, and embeds, enables drag-and-drop block reordering, includes data sanitization, supports extensibility through custom tools and plugins, and is designed for integration with backend systems that require structured content storage.
TinyMCE is a JavaScript-based WYSIWYG rich text editor that transforms HTML textarea or designated elements into a full editing interface for web applications.
It provides core rich text editing, clean paste from Word and 
Google Docs, enhanced media embedding and optimization, real-time collaboration with comments and revision history, document import/export and 
Markdown support via a paid plugin, productivity tools such as templates and math equations, and integrations with 12+ frameworks such as 
React, 
Angular, 
Vue, and 
Svelte.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5K editor loads)$92/month
(20K editor loads)$170/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 44th most popular in Slovenia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 48th most popular in Saudi Arabia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 54th most popular in Norway in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 56th most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 57th most popular in Thailand in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
CKEditor
Froala
Quill
MediumEditor🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.