🆚 CKEditor vs. Quill

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

JavaScript library
JavaScript library

About

CKEditor is a JavaScript-based WYSIWYG rich text editor used in web applications to create and edit formatted content directly in the browser.

It provides rich text and media editing, real-time and asynchronous collaboration, HTML and Markdown output, import from Word, export to Word and PDF, over 100 available plugins, and native integrations with frameworks such as React, Angular, Vue, Next.js, and Laravel.

Quill is an open-source JavaScript WYSIWYG text editor designed to provide consistent content editing across browsers using a structured document model.

It is built around a JSON-based delta format for representing content and changes, supports core text formatting and embeds, offers a modular API with themes and modules, and requires third-party plugins or converters to export content as HTML.

Headquarters

Warsaw, Poland

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️GNU GPL v2+, open source
Cloud
Free version ✔️1K editor loads per month
Essential
(5K editor loads)
$160/month
Professional
(20K editor loads)
$450/month
Extra editor loads$30-60/1K
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

JavaScript Libraries › Rank #116
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #205

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The CKEditor JavaScript library is 5 times more popular than Quill.
Total websites

Market share

JavaScript Libraries

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

CKEditor is more popular in the United States, Russia, and France, while Quill is more popular in China and Mongolia.
United States
Russia
France
Spain
Germany
United Kingdom
Ukraine
Italy
Netherlands
Brazil

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

CKEditor is more popular than Quill in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Health
Internet Services
Government/Military
Public Information
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Blogs/Wiki

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,131
#2,512
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,678
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.