🆚 Clerk vs. Supabase
- 📈 Supabase is much more popular than Clerk.
- 🌎 Supabase is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and China.
- 🌍 Clerk is more popular in Norway and Romania.
Clerk
SupabaseType
About
Clerk is an authentication and user management service for 
Next.js, 
Remix, 
Nuxt, 
React, 
Vue, and other frameworks that provides prebuilt interfaces and APIs to handle user identity, sessions, and access control.
It offers drop-in UI components for sign-in, sign-up, user profiles, organizations, and billing, supports over 20 social login providers, and includes multifactor authentication, session lifecycle management, bot and fraud prevention, and customizable roles and permissions.
Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform based on 
PostgreSQL.
It provides a hosted Postgres database with RESTful and 
GraphQL APIs, built-in authentication, secure file storage, support for edge functions written in 
TypeScript with global deployment, role-based access control, and row-level security.
Headquarters
Pricing
(MFA, SMS authentication)$25+/month
(8 GB per project, 100K MAU)$25+/month
(+ SSO)$599+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 12nd most popular in the United States in the Authentication category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Authentication category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Sweden in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Brazil in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in China in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in France in the Authentication category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Google Identity
Facebook Login
Auth0
Keycloak
Auth.js
Amazon Web Services
Microsoft Azure
Firebase
Google App Engine🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.