🆚 ClickCease vs. Oracle WAF
- 📈 ClickCease is much more popular than Oracle WAF.
- 🌎 ClickCease is more popular in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Oracle WAF is more popular in Japan, Jamaica, and Korea.
ClickCease
Oracle WAFType
About
ClickCease is an ad fraud prevention platform that protects paid advertising campaigns by detecting and blocking invalid clicks, impressions, and bot traffic across major networks such as Google, Meta, and Microsoft Ads.
It uses real-time analysis with over 2,000 behavior tests per visit, automatic IP and audience exclusion lists, customizable filters for geo, VPN and device blocking, detailed analytics including session recordings and fraud heatmaps, competitor click monitoring, and site-level bot mitigation options to reduce wasted spend and improve campaign data quality.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a cloud-based, PCI-compliant, global security service that protects applications from malicious and unwanted internet traffic.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5K visits)$99/month
(10K+ visits)$149+/month
(50K+ visits)$349+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Israel in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Canada in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Ukraine in the Fraud Prevention category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United States in the Bot Mitigation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Human
CHEQ
ClickGuard
Lunio
Clixtell
AWS WAF Captcha🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,995 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.