🆚 Cloud Firestore vs. Neo4j
- 📈 Cloud Firestore is much more popular than Neo4j.
- 🌍 Cloud Firestore is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Database
Database
About
Cloud Firestore is a scalable, enterprise-grade, JSON-compatible document database from Firebase and
Google Cloud.
It offers offline support and real-time listeners, provides strong consistency, atomic batch writes, automatic multi-region replication, and scales to about 1M concurrent client connections and 10,000 writes per second.
Neo4j is a high-performance NoSQL graph database built to leverage both data and its relationships.
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
San Mateo, California, United States
Pricing
Free tier ✔️ 1 GB of storage + 10 GB/month of outbound traffic
Storage $0.1+GB/month
Outbound traffic $0.01+/GB
Self Managed
Free version ✔️ Community Edition, open source
Enterprise Edition Custom
AuraDB Managed
Free version ✔️
Professional $65/GB/month
Business Critical $146/GB/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Cloud Firestore database is 9 times more popular than Neo4j.
Total websites
Market share
Databases
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Cloud Firestore is more popular than Neo4j in all countries.
United States
India
United Kingdom
Brazil
Germany
Japan
France
Australia
Spain
Netherlands
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Cloud Firestore is more popular than Neo4j in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Finance/Banking
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Sports
Education/Reference
Health
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Neo4j