🆚 Cloud Firestore vs. PouchDB
- 📈 Cloud Firestore is much more popular than PouchDB.
- 🌎 Cloud Firestore is more popular in the United States, India, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 PouchDB is more popular in New Zealand and Iran.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Database
Database
About
Cloud Firestore is a scalable, enterprise-grade, JSON-compatible document database from Firebase and
Google Cloud.
It offers offline support and real-time listeners, provides strong consistency, atomic batch writes, automatic multi-region replication, and scales to about 1M concurrent client connections and 10,000 writes per second.
PouchDB is an open-source JavaScript database inspired by Apache CouchDB that is designed to run well within the browser.
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Pricing
Free tier ✔️ 1 GB of storage + 10 GB/month of outbound traffic
Storage $0.1+GB/month
Outbound traffic $0.01+/GB
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Cloud Firestore database is 16 times more popular than PouchDB.
Total websites
Market share
Databases
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Cloud Firestore is more popular in the United States, India, and the United Kingdom, while PouchDB is more popular in New Zealand and Iran.
United States
India
United Kingdom
Brazil
Japan
France
Germany
Australia
Spain
New Zealand
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Cloud Firestore is more popular than PouchDB in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Sports
Education/Reference
Finance/Banking
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.