🆚 Concrete CMS vs. ProcessWire
- 📈 Concrete CMS is noticeably more popular than ProcessWire.
- 🌎 Concrete CMS is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands.
- 🌍 ProcessWire is more popular in Germany, Italy, and Belgium.
Type
About
Concrete CMS is an open-source content management system built with PHP and MySQL that combines in-context editing and modular page building.
It provides on-page and WYSIWYG editing, a flexible block and template system, version control, multilingual support, multisite management, built-in SEO, and a marketplace with thousands of add-ons and themes.
ProcessWire is a PHP-based open-source content management system and web application framework focused on flexible content modeling and API-driven development.
It offers a hierarchical page structure with custom field types, a jQuery-style API, role-based access control, multilingual support, built-in caching and search, configurable URLs and SEO settings, and an extensible ecosystem with over 600 third-party modules.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Liechtenstein in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Japan in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in New Zealand in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Hungary in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Finland in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Switzerland in the CMS category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Italy in the CMS category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Belgium in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.