🆚 CorePublish vs. Enonic
- 📈 Enonic is slightly more popular than CorePublish.
- 🌍 Enonic is more popular in Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands.
- 🌍 CorePublish is more popular in American Samoa.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
CorePublish is a Norwegian content management system.
Enonic is a composable content management platform that supports headless, hybrid, and traditional CMS architectures.
It provides a flexible schema system, multi-site and multi-language management, role-based access control, content versioning and workflows, starter kits for React and
Next.js,
GraphQL and REST APIs, and an integrated AI assistant called Juke that helps create, edit, and translate content.
Headquarters
Sandefjord, Norway
Oslo, Norway
Pricing
Free version ❌
Custom
Free version ✔️Open source
SaaS
Free version ✔️5 GB storage
Professional€1,000+
EnterpriseCustom
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Enonic CMS is 1.2 times more popular than CorePublish.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Enonic is more popular in Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands, while CorePublish is more popular in American Samoa.
Norway
Sweden
Netherlands
Finland
Denmark
American Samoa
United Kingdom
Kyrgyzstan
Germany
Luxembourg
Awards
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Norway in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Norway in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Enonic is more popular among sites focused on sports, government and military, and public information, while CorePublish is more commonly used on business and non-profit, advocacy and NGO sites.
Business
Sports
Government/Military
Public Information
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Internet Services
Health
Travel
Entertainment
Politics/Opinion
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Enonic
Builder.io
Brightspot