🆚 CorePublish vs. Labrador CMS
- 📈 Labrador CMS is noticeably more popular than CorePublish.
- 🌍 Labrador CMS is more popular in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark.
- 🌍 CorePublish is more popular in American Samoa.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
CorePublish is a Norwegian content management system.
Labrador CMS is a Norwegian cloud-based content management system for professional publishers and newsrooms.
Headquarters
Sandefjord, Norway
Oslo, Norway
Pricing
Free version ❌
Custom
Free version ❌
Small
(5 users, 1.2M pageviews)€1,133/month
(5 users, 1.2M pageviews)€1,133/month
Medium
(15 users, 1.2M pageviews)€2,266/month
(15 users, 1.2M pageviews)€2,266/month
Large
(30 users, 1.2M pageviews)€3,400/month
(30 users, 1.2M pageviews)€3,400/month
Enterprise
(60+ users)€6,799+/month
(60+ users)€6,799+/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Labrador CMS platform is 1.4 times more popular than CorePublish.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Labrador CMS is more popular in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, while CorePublish is more popular in American Samoa.
Norway
Sweden
Denmark
United Kingdom
Germany
American Samoa
Finland
United States
Belgium
Chile
Awards
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Norway in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Norway in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Labrador CMS is more popular among sites focused on general news, entertainment, and non-profit, advocacy and NGO, while CorePublish is more commonly used on business sites.
General News
Business
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Health
Education/Reference
Public Information
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Enonic
Ring Publishing
Metro Publisher