🆚 Labrador CMS vs. Ring Publishing

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

Labrador CMS is a Norwegian cloud-based content management system for professional publishers and newsrooms.

Ring Publishing is a cloud-based content experience platform from Ringier Axel Springer Media AG that provides a headless and hybrid CMS with integrated engagement and monetization tools for media organizations.

It is built as a modular SaaS platform with a composable architecture and API-first approach, supports custom content types, advanced editorial workflows, multisite management, and digital and video asset handling, and includes AI editorial assistants, personalization, A/B testing, and analytics.

Headquarters

Oslo, Norway
Berlin, Germany

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
Small
(5 users, 1.2M pageviews)
€1,133/month
Medium
(15 users, 1.2M pageviews)
€2,266/month
Large
(30 users, 1.2M pageviews)
€3,400/month
Enterprise
(60+ users)
€6,799+/month
Free version ❌
Custom

Categories

CMS › Rank #110
CMS › Rank #125

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Labrador CMS platform is 1.3 times more popular than Ring Publishing.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Labrador CMS is more popular in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, while Ring Publishing is more popular in Poland, Serbia, and the United States.
Norway
Poland
Serbia
United States
Sweden
Hungary
Denmark
United Kingdom
Germany
Bosnia and Herzegovina

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Labrador CMS is more popular among sites focused on general news, business, and non-profit, advocacy and NGO, while Ring Publishing is more commonly used on entertainment, blogs and wiki, and portal sites sites.
General News
Entertainment
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Education/Reference
Portal Sites
Online Shopping
Public Information

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#2,374
#9,360
#13,766
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#157
#430
#1,784
#2,341
View more ➝

See also

🗃️ About This Data