🆚 Labrador CMS vs. RebelMouse
- 📈 Labrador CMS is noticeably more popular than RebelMouse.
- 🌍 Labrador CMS is more popular in Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 RebelMouse is more popular in the United States and Hungary.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Labrador CMS is a Norwegian cloud-based content management system for professional publishers and newsrooms.
RebelMouse is a cloud-based CMS for news publishers looking to scale their site's speed, engagement, and audience growth.
Headquarters
Oslo, Norway
New York, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌
Small
(5 users, 1.2M pageviews)€1,133/month
(5 users, 1.2M pageviews)€1,133/month
Medium
(15 users, 1.2M pageviews)€2,266/month
(15 users, 1.2M pageviews)€2,266/month
Large
(30 users, 1.2M pageviews)€3,400/month
(30 users, 1.2M pageviews)€3,400/month
Enterprise
(60+ users)€6,799+/month
(60+ users)€6,799+/month
Free version ❌
$5,000+/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Labrador CMS platform is 1.9 times more popular than RebelMouse.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Labrador CMS is more popular in Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, while RebelMouse is more popular in the United States and Hungary.
Norway
United States
Sweden
United Kingdom
Denmark
Germany
Hungary
Australia
Laos
Italy
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Labrador CMS is more popular among sites focused on general news, entertainment, and business, while RebelMouse is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, marketing and merchandising, and politics and opinion sites.
General News
Entertainment
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Education/Reference
Politics/Opinion
Internet Services
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Enonic
Ring Publishing
Metro Publisher
Blox CMS
Arc XP