🆚 CuteNews vs. Kirby
- 📈 CuteNews is noticeably more popular than Kirby.
- 🌍 CuteNews is more popular in Russia, the United Kingdom, and Poland.
- 🌎 Kirby is more popular in Germany, the United States, and France.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
KirbyType
Content management system
Content management system
About
CuteNews is an open-source news management system developed in 
PHP and based on flat files.
Kirby is a commercial flat-file content management system that lets users build websites using plain text files for content without requiring a database.
It supports 
Markdown for text formatting, 
YAML-based blueprints to define structured fields and content models, multilingual sites, customizable user roles and permissions, and built-in image manipulation and media management.
Headquarters
Neckargemünd, Germany
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free version ✔️ Free upon request for students, selected educational projects, charities and nonprofits
Basic €99
Enterprise €349
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The CuteNews CMS platform is 1.6 times more popular than Kirby.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
CuteNews is more popular in Russia, the United Kingdom, and Poland, while Kirby is more popular in Germany, the United States, and France.
Germany
United States
Russia
France
United Kingdom
Poland
Italy
Czech Republic
Spain
Canada
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
CuteNews is more popular among sites focused on Internet services, sports, and software and hardware, while Kirby is more commonly used on business sites.
Internet Services
Sports
Software/Hardware
Games
Recreation/Hobbies
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Online Shopping
Health
Technical/Business Forums
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.