🆚 date-fns vs. Slick
- 📈 Slick is much more popular than date-fns.
- 🌍 Slick is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
SlickType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
date-fns provides the most comprehensive set of over 200 functions for manipulating dates in 
JavaScript.
Slick is an open-source 
jQuery carousel library for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and keyboard-accessible content sliders.
It offers more than 50 configuration options, responsive breakpoint-specific settings, infinite looping, lazy loading, variable-width and vertical layouts, synchronized sliders, and 
CSS3 transitions.
Headquarters
New York, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Slick JavaScript library is 365 times more popular than date-fns.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Slick is more popular than date-fns in all countries.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
India
Italy
Spain
Brazil
Awards
- ⬆️ 224th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Slick is more popular than date-fns in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Travel
Internet Services
Sports
Health
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.