🆚 Fancyapps vs. Slick
- 📈 Slick is noticeably more popular than Fancyapps.
- 🌎 Slick is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Germany.
- 🌍 Fancyapps is more popular in Russia, Turkey, and the Czech Republic.
Type
About
Fancyapps is a commercial JavaScript UI component library for creating lightboxes, carousels, and interactive image viewers.
It provides touch gesture support, synchronized and nested carousels, image zooming and panning, lazy loading, configurable plugins, and integrations with React,
Vue, and plain JavaScript applications.
Slick is an open-source jQuery carousel library for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and keyboard-accessible content sliders.
It offers more than 50 configuration options, responsive breakpoint-specific settings, infinite looping, lazy loading, variable-width and vertical layouts, synchronized sliders, and CSS3 transitions.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Slovakia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Faroe Islands in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Slick
Lightbox
PhotoSwipe
LightGallery
Siema