🆚 DeepL vs. GlotPress
- 📈 GlotPress is much more popular than DeepL.
- 🌍 GlotPress is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ DeepL is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Translation software
Translation software
About
DeepL is an AI language platform and machine translation service that supports over 30 languages.
GlotPress is an open-source 
WordPress plugin that lets you set up your own collaborative, web-based software translation tool.
Headquarters
Cologne, Germany
Pricing
Free version ✔️
Individual$10.49/month
Team$34.49/user/month
Business$68.99/user/month
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The GlotPress translation software is 830 times more popular than DeepL.
Total websites
Market share
Translation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
GlotPress is more popular than DeepL in all countries.
Japan
Germany
Spain
Italy
France
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Brazil
Australia
Poland
Awards
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Germany in the Translation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Translation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the Translation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Translation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Translation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Translation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
GlotPress is more popular than DeepL in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
WPML
Google Translate
Polylang
qTranslate-XT🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.