🆚 DeepL vs. Polylang
- 📈 Polylang is much more popular than DeepL.
- 🌍 Polylang is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ DeepL is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
PolylangType
Translation software
Translation software
About
DeepL is an AI language platform and machine translation service that supports over 30 languages.
Polylang is a 
WordPress plugin that helps users translate posts, pages, media, categories, tags, widgets, navigation menus, and more.
Headquarters
Cologne, Germany
Bourgoin Jallieu, France
Pricing
Free version ✔️
Individual$10.49/month
Team$34.49/user/month
Business$68.99/user/month
Free version ✔️Open source
Polylang Pro€99+
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Polylang translation software is 181 times more popular than DeepL.
Total websites
Market share
Translation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Polylang is more popular than DeepL in all countries.
Germany
Spain
France
Italy
Ukraine
Poland
United States
Switzerland
Finland
Netherlands
Awards
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Germany in the Translation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Kazakhstan in the Translation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Uzbekistan in the Translation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Kyrgyzstan in the Translation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Iraq in the Translation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Ukraine in the Translation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Polylang is more popular than DeepL in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Travel
Internet Services
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Software/Hardware
Online Shopping
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
WPML
Google Translate
qTranslate-XT🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.