🆚 EC-CUBE vs. Ochanoko
- 📈 EC-CUBE is twice as popular as Ochanoko.
- 🌎 EC-CUBE is more popular in Japan and the United States.
- 🌍 Ochanoko is more popular in France.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
E-commerce platform
E-commerce platform
About
EC-CUBE is a Japanese open source e-commerce software platform for building and operating custom online stores.
It provides core e-commerce functions such as product, order, and customer management, flexible templates and responsive mobile layouts, integrations with a wide range of payment methods including PayPal,
Stripe, Amazon Pay, and Paidy, and a plugin ecosystem with hundreds of paid and free extensions.
Ochanoko is a Japanese e-commerce platform.
Headquarters
Osaka, Japan
Kobe, Japan
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
PaymentPlus
Beginner2,980+ JPY/month
Standard5,980+ JPY/month
Premium9,980+ JPY/month
EC-CUBE EnterpriseCustom
Categories
E-Commerce › Rank #42
E-Commerce › Rank #85
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The EC-CUBE e-commerce platform is 2.5 times more popular than Ochanoko.
Total websites
Market share
E-Commerce
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
EC-CUBE is more popular in Japan and the United States, while Ochanoko is more popular in France.
Japan
United States
France
China
Hong Kong
Isle of Man
Netherlands
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Singapore
Sweden
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Japan in the E-Commerce category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Japan in the E-Commerce category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
EC-CUBE is more popular than Ochanoko in all market segments.
Online Shopping
Fashion/Beauty
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Travel
Health
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.