🆚 Emacs vs. Google Web Designer
- 📈 Google Web Designer is three times more popular than Emacs.
- 🌎 Google Web Designer is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Portugal.
- 🌍 Emacs is more popular in Germany and France.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Emacs
Google Web DesignerType
HTML editor
HTML editor
About
Emacs is a fully programmable text editor available for most modern operating systems.
Windows
LinuxHeadquarters
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Mountain View, California, United States
gnu.orgPricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️
Categories
HTML Editors › Rank #37
HTML Editors › Rank #27
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Google Web Designer HTML editor is 3 times more popular than Emacs.
Total websites
Market share
HTML Editors
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Google Web Designer is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Portugal, while Emacs is more popular in Germany and France.
Germany
Japan
United States
France
Portugal
Spain
Poland
Czech Republic
United Kingdom
Canada
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Google Web Designer is more popular among sites focused on business, entertainment, and general news, while Emacs is more commonly used on personal pages sites.
Personal Pages
Business
Entertainment
General News
Public Information
Forum/Bulletin Boards
Health
Blogs/Wiki
Travel
Finance/Banking
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Visual Studio Code
Adobe DreamWeaver
Free Software Foundation company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.