🆚 Embetty vs. Juicer
- 📈 Juicer is much more popular than Embetty.
- 🌍 Juicer is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Embetty is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
EmbettyType
Widget
Social sharing tool
About
Embetty is an open-source widget system developed by Heise Online that displays embedded content such as tweets or 
YouTube videos while protecting user privacy.
Juicer is a social media aggregator that allows you to display content from up to 18 different social media channels in a customizable feed on your website.
Headquarters
Hanover, Germany
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
GitHubPricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️2 sources
Starter (5 sources)$25/month
Pro (30 sources)$99/month
Enterprise$199+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Juicer social sharing tool is 17 times more popular than Embetty.
Total websites
Market share
Widgets
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Juicer is more popular than Embetty in all countries.
United States
Germany
Finland
United Kingdom
Australia
Switzerland
Italy
France
Austria
Canada
Awards
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Germany in the Widgets category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Finland in the Social Sharing category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Finland in the Widgets category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Switzerland in the Social Sharing category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Austria in the Social Sharing category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in New Zealand in the Social Sharing category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Juicer is more popular than Embetty in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Travel
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Sports
Health
Entertainment
Online Shopping
Public Information
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
