🆚 ES6 Shim vs. jQuery Cookie
- 📈 jQuery Cookie is much more popular than ES6 Shim.
- 🌍 jQuery Cookie is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
ES6 ShimType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Provides compatibility shims so that legacy 
JavaScript engines behave as closely as possible to ECMAScript 6 (Harmony).
A deprecated 
jQuery plugin for reading, writing and deleting cookies.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The jQuery Cookie JavaScript library is 226 times more popular than ES6 Shim.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Legacy
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
jQuery Cookie is more popular than ES6 Shim in all countries.
United States
Japan
Russia
United Kingdom
Germany
Spain
Italy
France
Poland
Korea
Awards
- ⬆️ 52nd most popular in France in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 59th most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 62nd most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 223rd most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 235th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Russia in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Belarus in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Kazakhstan in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
jQuery Cookie is more popular than ES6 Shim in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Health
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Polyfill
Regenerator
Fastly Polyfill
Babel
UAParser.js🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.