🆚 esm.sh vs. jsDelivr
- 📈 jsDelivr is much more popular than esm.sh.
- 🌍 jsDelivr is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Public CDN
Public CDN
About
esm.sh is a JavaScript content delivery network powered by
Cloudflare that serves
NPM packages as native ES modules for browsers and
Deno without local installation or builds.
It allows developers to import JavaScript modules directly from HTTP URLs, and supports TypeScript type definitions, CommonJS to ES module conversion, dependency bundling, JSX and TSX transpilation, import maps, and packages from NPM, JSR,
GitHub, and pkg.pr.new registries.
Headquarters
Barnet, England, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️
Categories
Public CDN › Rank #16
Public CDN › Rank #3
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The jsDelivr public CDN is 570 times more popular than esm.sh.
Total websites
Market share
Public CDN
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
jsDelivr is more popular than esm.sh in all countries.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
France
India
Russia
Germany
Netherlands
Brazil
Italy
Awards
- 🔥 12nd most popular in the United States in the Public CDN category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Public CDN category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Faroe Islands in the Public CDN category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Russia in the Public CDN category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Norway in the Public CDN category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Kazakhstan in the Public CDN category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
jsDelivr is more popular than esm.sh in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Health
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.



