🆚 Fancyapps vs. Splide
- 📈 Fancyapps is much more popular than Splide.
- 🌎 Fancyapps is more popular in the United States, Russia, and Germany.
- 🌍 Splide is more popular in Turkmenistan and Guam.
Fancyapps
SplideType
About
Fancyapps is a commercial 
JavaScript UI component library for creating lightboxes, carousels, and interactive image viewers.
It provides touch gesture support, synchronized and nested carousels, image zooming and panning, lazy loading, configurable plugins, and integrations with 
React, 
Vue, and plain JavaScript applications.
Splide is a lightweight, accessible slider and carousel library written in 
TypeScript.
It requires no dependencies, supports multiple slide layouts, touch and mouse dragging, autoplay, lazy loading, responsive breakpoints, and RTL and vertical modes.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Slovakia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Sweden in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Estonia in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in France in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Swiper
Lightbox
PhotoSwipe
LightGallery
Slick
Flickity
Tiny Slider
Siema🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.