🆚 Firebase Authentication vs. Supabase
- 📈 Supabase is slightly more popular than Firebase Authentication.
- 🌎 Supabase is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and China.
- 🌍 Firebase Authentication is more popular in India, Australia, and Canada.
Type
About
Firebase Authentication is a backend authentication service that enables applications to sign in users using email and password, third-party identity providers, email links, and phone numbers.
It offers sign-in with services such as Google,
Facebook,
Apple, and
GitHub, provides ready-made UI components and SDKs for web, iOS, Android, and
Unity, supports anonymous accounts, and includes phone and multi-factor authentication if used with Identity Platform.
Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform based on PostgreSQL.
It provides a hosted Postgres database with RESTful and GraphQL APIs, built-in authentication, secure file storage, support for edge functions written in
TypeScript with global deployment, role-based access control, and row-level security.
Headquarters
Pricing
(email, phone, social)
(OpenID Connect, SAML)
(8 GB per project, 100K MAU)$25+/month
(+ SSO)$599+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in India in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Australia in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Canada in the Authentication category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Brazil in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in China in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in France in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the Authentication category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,363,931 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.