🆚 Fluent vs. USWDS

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Design system
Design system

About

Fluent Design System is Microsoft's cross-platform design language that defines how user interfaces should look and behave across Windows, web, and mobile applications.

It uses a unified set of design tokens for colors, spacing, icons, and typography, and supports adaptive layouts for different screen sizes.

The United States Web Design System helps the federal government build fast, accessible, mobile-friendly websites.

Headquarters

Redmond, Washington, United States
Washington, D.C., United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Design Systems › Rank #6
Design Systems › Rank #3
UI Frameworks › Rank #26

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The USWDS design system is 1.6 times more popular than Fluent.
Total websites

Market share

Design Systems

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

USWDS is more popular in the United States, India, and China, while Fluent is more popular in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Canada.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Canada
Australia
India
France
Netherlands
Japan
Spain

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

USWDS is more popular among sites focused on government and military, business, and marketing and merchandising, while Fluent is more commonly used on non-profit, advocacy and NGO, real estate, and sports sites.
Government/Military
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Health
Finance/Banking
Online Shopping
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Travel
Internet Services

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#7,681
#27,775
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#110
#183
#1,014
#1,093
#1,186
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.