🆚 Flutter vs. Quasar

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Frontend framework
Frontend framework

About

Flutter is a framework for building cross-platform applications using the Dart programming language.

It renders its own UI via the Skia graphics engine, offers a rich set of customizable widgets following both Material Design and Cupertino styles, compiles Dart code ahead-of-time into native ARM or x86 machine code for better performance, and allows deployment to iOS, Android, web, macOS, Windows, and Linux with a single codebase.

Quasar is an open-source framework based on Vue.js that lets developers build responsive websites, PWA, SSR, mobile, and desktop applications from a single codebase.

It offers over 70 customizable UI components, automatic tree-shaking, integrated platform detection, support for Cordova and Capacitor for mobile, Electron for desktop, built-in CLI tools with hot-reload, theming, RTL support, and multiple build modes such as SPA, SSR, PWA, and BEX.

Headquarters

Mountain View, California, United States
Bucharest, Romania

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Frontend Frameworks › Rank #26
Frontend Frameworks › Rank #20
UI Frameworks › Rank #30

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Quasar frontend framework is 1.8 times more popular than Flutter.
Total websites

Market share

Frontend Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Quasar is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Brazil, while Flutter is more popular in India, Italy, and Japan.
United States
Germany
Brazil
France
United Kingdom
Russia
Iran
India
Italy
Australia

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Quasar is more popular than Flutter in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Public Information
Blogs/Wiki
Travel
Fashion/Beauty

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#62,393
#68,082
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#3,591
#4,859
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.