🆚 Flutter vs. Uni-app

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Frontend framework
Frontend framework

About

Flutter is a framework for building cross-platform applications using the Dart programming language.

It renders its own UI via the Skia graphics engine, offers a rich set of customizable widgets following both Material Design and Cupertino styles, compiles Dart code ahead-of-time into native ARM or x86 machine code for better performance, and allows deployment to iOS, Android, web, macOS, Windows, and Linux with a single codebase.

Uni-app is a Chinese cross-platform framework based on Vue.js that lets developers use one codebase to build apps for iOS, Android, Web (H5), and many mini-program platforms such as WeChat, Alipay, Baidu, QQ, and others.

Headquarters

Mountain View, California, United States
Beijing, China

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Frontend Frameworks › Rank #26
Frontend Frameworks › Rank #28

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Flutter frontend framework is 1.2 times more popular than Uni-app.
Total websites

Market share

Frontend Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Flutter is more popular in India, Brazil, and Italy, while Uni-app is more popular in China, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
China
United States
India
United Kingdom
Hong Kong
Brazil
Italy
Japan
France
Germany

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Flutter is more popular than Uni-app in all market segments.
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Business
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Government/Military
Online Shopping
Games
Finance/Banking
Software/Hardware

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#62,393
#68,082
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#27,307
#48,471
#51,133
#91,394
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.