🆚 flv.js vs. Lite YouTube

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Video player
Video player

About

An HTML5 Flash Video (FLV) Player written in pure JavaScript without Flash.

A faster YouTube embed.

Headquarters

Shanghai, China

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Video Players › Rank #7
Video Players › Rank #9
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #121
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #172

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The flv.js video player is 2.1 times more popular than Lite YouTube.
Total websites

Market share

Video Players
JavaScript Libraries

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

flv.js is more popular in the United States, China, and Japan, while Lite YouTube is more popular in Russia, the Czech Republic, and Taiwan.
United States
China
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Spain
Australia
Italy
Netherlands

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

flv.js is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and education and reference, while Lite YouTube is more commonly used on online shopping, travel, and health sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Travel
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#2,549
#2,588
#7,870
#8,758
#9,229
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#2,747
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.