🆚 flv.js vs. YouTube Player
- 📈 YouTube Player is much more popular than flv.js.
- 🌎 YouTube Player is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 flv.js is more popular in China.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Video player
Video player
About
An HTML5 Flash Video (FLV) Player written in pure JavaScript without Flash.
The embedded Youtube video player.
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Mountain View, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The YouTube video player is 29 times more popular than flv.js.
Total websites
Market share
Video Players
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
YouTube Player is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, while flv.js is more popular in China.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
India
Germany
France
Spain
Australia
Brazil
Italy
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Japan in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Hong Kong in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Indonesia in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Vietnam in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Russia in the Video Players category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
YouTube Player is more popular than flv.js in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Health
Travel
Internet Services
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,370,405 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.