🆚 Font Squirrel vs. TypeSquare
- 📈 TypeSquare is much more popular than Font Squirrel.
- 🌍 TypeSquare is more popular in Japan, Taiwan, and Afghanistan.
- 🌎 Font Squirrel is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Font platform
Font platform
About
Font Squirrel is a library of free, hand-picked, high-quality, commercial-use fonts.
TypeSquare is a Japanese web font service.
Headquarters
San Mateo, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The TypeSquare font platform is 6 times more popular than Font Squirrel.
Total websites
Market share
Fonts
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
TypeSquare is more popular in Japan, Taiwan, and Afghanistan, while Font Squirrel is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
Japan
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Germany
France
Australia
India
Sweden
Brazil
Awards
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Fonts category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Japan in the Fonts category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
TypeSquare is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and marketing and merchandising, while Font Squirrel is more commonly used on sports and restaurants sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,824,193 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

