🆚 Forgejo vs. Google Code Archive
- 📈 Google Code Archive is much more popular than Forgejo.
- 🌍 Google Code Archive is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Forgejo is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.9M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Forgejo
Google Code ArchiveType
Code hosting platform
Code hosting platform
About
Forgejo is an open-source, 
Git-based code hosting and collaboration platform that started as a fork of 
Gitea.
It enables repository management, issue tracking, code review, and workflow automation, and includes pull requests, kanban boards, wikis, package registries, continuous integration through Forgejo Actions, and 
ActivityPub-based federation support.
Google Code was a code hosting service for open-source projects. It was discontinued in 2016 and is now available as an archive.
Headquarters
Berlin, Germany
Mountain View, California, United States
code.google.com/archive/Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open-source projects only
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Google Code Archive platform is 17 times more popular than Forgejo.
Total websites
Market share
Code Hosting
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Google Code Archive is more popular than Forgejo in all countries.
United States
Germany
Poland
France
Japan
United Kingdom
Brazil
Vietnam
Russia
Canada
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Code Hosting category.
- ⬆️ 57th most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 64th most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Google Code Archive is more popular than Forgejo in all market segments.
Business
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Technical Information
Technical/Business Forums
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Personal Pages
Education/Reference
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Name
Rank
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,906,822 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.