🆚 Fotorama vs. Slick
- 📈 Slick is much more popular than Fotorama.
- 🌍 Slick is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Fotorama is particularly popular in Russia.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
SlickType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Fotorama is a simple yet powerful responsive 
jQuery image gallery.
Slick is an open-source, fully responsive and accessible carousel library.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Slick JavaScript library is 68 times more popular than Fotorama.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Slick is more popular than Fotorama in all countries.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
France
India
Russia
Italy
Australia
Brazil
Awards
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 47th most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 53rd most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 77th most popular in Ukraine in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 94th most popular in Vietnam in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Faroe Islands in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Gibraltar in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Botswana in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Slick is more popular than Fotorama in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Sports
Health
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
LightGallery
Justified Gallery
Swiper
Owl Carousel
Tiny Slider🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.