🆚 Gamma vs. Lovable
- 📈 Lovable is much more popular than Gamma.
- 🌍 Lovable is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Gamma is particularly popular in Brazil.
Gamma
LovableType
About
Gamma is an AI-powered no-code platform for creating presentations, websites, and documents by generating structured content and layouts from text prompts.
It uses multiple AI models to generate and refine content, offers more than 100 design themes, supports real-time collaboration, exporting to formats such as PPT, PDF, and 
Google Slides, publishing as shareable web pages.
Lovable is an AI-powered platform that enables users to build full-stack web applications by describing their ideas in plain English.
It features natural language prompts that generate 
React frontends with 
Tailwind-native visual controls, 
Supabase backend integration, bidirectional code syncing with 
GitHub, one-click deployment, and integrations with 
Stripe, 
Shopify, 
Clerk, and 
Make.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1K credits) $12/month
(4K credits, 10 custom domains) $25/month
(6K credits per seat) $240/seat/year
(10K credits per seat) $480/seat/year
(20K credits, 100 custom domains) $100/month
(5 daily, 100 monthly credits) $25/month
(100 monthly credits) $50/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in India in the Build Tools category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Brazil in the Build Tools category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Build Tools category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in the United States in the Build Tools category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Germany in the Build Tools category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Typedream
WeWeb
Google AI Studio
Replit
FlutterFlow🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,578,628 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.