🆚 GitBook vs. Lume

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Static site generator
Static site generator

About

GitBook is a cloud-based documentation platform for creating and publishing product documentation, API references, and knowledge bases.

It provides a collaborative editor with Markdown and rich formatting, structured navigation and versioning, AI-powered features such as GitBook Agent and embedded AI assistants for writing help and query answering, automatic generation of llms.txt for large language models, and integrations with GitHub, GitLab and other tools.

Lume is a fast and flexible static site generator built with Deno.

Headquarters

Covina, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️Open source
Subscriptions
Premium$79/site/month
Ultimate$299/site/month
EnterpriseCustom
Additionaly paid$15/user/month
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The GitBook static site generator is 14 times more popular than Lume.
Total websites

Market share

Static Site Generators

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

GitBook is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and China, while Lume is more popular in Japan.
United States
United Kingdom
China
Germany
France
Russia
Canada
Netherlands
Japan
Switzerland

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

GitBook is more popular than Lume in all market segments.
Technical Information
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Business
Games

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#87,628
#250,239
#255,262
#338,463
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#718,075
#3,965,025
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.